Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005056›Full record

ArticleWomen's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)2021

Revealing Economic and Racial Injustices: Demographics of Abortion Fund Callers on the U.S.-Mexico Border.

Ophra Leyser-Whalen, Luis Torres, Brianna Gonzales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Elevating the Needs of Minor Adolescents in a Landscape of Reduced Abortion Access in the United States.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ophra Leyser-WhalenDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3607-4269
Luis TorresDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Brianna GonzalesDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.

Funding

Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARSUL1GM118970 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$17.9M
Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARS - Student Training CoreTL4GM118971 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$9.9M
Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARS - Research Enrichment CoreRL5GM118969 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118969NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118971NIGMS NIH HHS UL1 GM118970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are multiple accessibility challenges to abortion care in the United States. Most abortion research relies on clinic data, whereas we utilized data from an abortion fund on the U.S.-Mexico border. The majority of the sample were Latinx (62.2%), were 20-29 years old (59.7%), were in the first trimester (65.4%), and traveled hundreds of miles to an abortion clinic. Younger age, being in the third trimester, not having insurance, and having some resources were associated with likelihood of receiving aid for an abortion procedure. There is still a great need for abortion funding and access, particularly for young, economically disadvantaged people of color.

Indexed as

Abortionabortion fundadolescentsLatinxTexas

Identifiers

PMID35005056
PMCPMC8741197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.