ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Comparison of Lateralized Versus Medialized Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scapular Alignment Restoration After Posterior Fixation of Displaced Scapular Fractures.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Comparison of functional outcomes between medialized and lateralized reverse shoulder prostheses in acute proximal humerus fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Heterotopic ossifications in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty and their impact on long-term outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Absence of scapular notching in lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a mid-term clinical and radiological evaluation.JSES international · 2025Article
- Article
- Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty vs. Medialized Design with Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Cuff Tear Arthropathy with Loss of External Rotation and ER Lag Sign.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A reduced scapulo-humeral angle contributes to the development of scapular notching in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Does glenoid inclination affect the anterior stability of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A biomechanical study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Shaping the bone autograft for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without the use of any specific instrumentation.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024Article
- Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Influence of lateralized versus medialized reverse shoulder arthroplasty design on external and internal rotation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2024Article
- Towards optimal reverse total shoulder arthroplasty design: reconsidering the role of lateralized implants.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2024Article
- Implant selection for successful reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an established procedure for cuff tear arthropathy. More lateralized prostheses have been designed to overcome the reported adverse outcomes of Grammont-style rTSA. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medialized and lateralized center of rotation (COR) in rTSA. STUDY
designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
methodsThis review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included were studies with a level of evidence ≥3 that compared medialized and lateralized rTSA with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Functional scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score (CSS), range of motion at final follow-up, gain of external rotation (ER), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, scapular notching, and heterotopic ossification (HO) were compared. Data were analyzed using random-effects or fixed-effects models in accordance with heterogeneity.
resultsFive retrospective cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled study (n = 594 patients) were included. Lateralized rTSA resulted in greater improvement in ER degree (
conclusionCompared with medialized rTSA, lateralized COR rTSA results in greater improvement in ER and the VAS pain score, decreased rates of scapular notching and HO, and no significant changes in functional outcome scores or the complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.