ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization at 2-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic transglenoid dynamic subscapular sling achieves short-term clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Article
- The relationship between subjective shoulder discomfort and quantitative humeral head translation in baseball players; cross-sectional study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Comparative Results After Latarjet Procedure for Shoulder Instability Management Between Primary and Revision Cases After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Procedure: A Midterm Follow-up Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- 1-year postoperative follow-up is adequate for arthroscopic Bankart repair: a comparison between 1-year and 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome scores.JSES international · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Stabilization of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability Using Two Anchors, One Single-Loaded plus One Double-Loaded; a Prospective Study with Modified Technique.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing shoulder function after surgery for shoulder instability, and previous studies have demonstrated its high reliability, low interrater variability, and ease of administration. PURPOSE: To identify the MCID for the OSIS after arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent shoulder instability. STUDY
designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsA longitudinally maintained institutional registry was queried for patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2010 to 2016 for recurrent shoulder instability secondary to a Bankart lesion without significant glenoid bone loss. The OSIS was completed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Patients were categorized into "expectations met" and "expectations unmet" groups using a questionnaire evaluating expectation fulfilment. The MCID of the OSIS at 1 year was calculated using 3 anchor-based approaches and a distribution-based approach. The 3 anchor-based approaches comprised (1) simple linear regression analysis, (2) receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and (3) calculation of mean differences in change for the OSIS between the "expectations met" and "expectations unmet" groups.
resultsThe study cohort comprised 68 men and 11 women aged 29.9 ± 12.7 years (mean ± SD). Duration of follow-up for all patients exceeded 1 year. The MCIDs for the OSIS based on the 4 calculation approaches yielded a narrow range of values, ranging from 7.7 to 8.5 for the anchor-based methods and 8.6 for the distribution-based method.
conclusionStudy results indicated that patients with recurrent shoulder instability without significant bone loss who undergo primary arthroscopic Bankart repair and have at least 8.6 points of improvement on their OSIS experience a clinically significant change at 1 year postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.