Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35004982›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021

Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration

Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Moura, Thomas R McCarty, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Galileu Ferreira Ayala Farias, Antonio Coutinho Madruga-Neto, Marvin Ryou, Christopher C Thompson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diogo Turiani Hourneaux MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP 05403-010, Brazil.
Thomas R McCartyDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Pichamol JirapinyoDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Igor Braga RibeiroGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP 05403-010, Brazil. igorbraga1@gmail.com.
Galileu Ferreira Ayala FariasDivision of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, SP 01246-903, Brazil.
Antonio Coutinho Madruga-NetoDivision of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, SP 01246-903, Brazil.
Marvin RyouDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Christopher C ThompsonDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) is considered a preferred technique for tissue sampling for solid lesions, fine needle biopsy (FNB) has recently been developed.

aimTo compare the accuracy of FNB

methodsA retrospective, multi-center study of EUS-guided tissue sampling using FNA

resultsA total of 1168 patients with solid lesions (

conclusionFNB is superior to FNA with equivalent diagnostic test characteristics compared to FNA + ROSE in the diagnosis of non-pancreatic solid lesions. Our results suggest that EUS-FNB may eliminate the need of ROSE and should be employed as a first-line method in the diagnosis of solid lesions.

Indexed as

CancerEndoscopic ultrasoundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisitionFine needle aspirationFine needle biopsySolid lesions

Identifiers

PMID35004982
PMCPMC8686153
OpenAlexW3216765038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.