Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35004940›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sociology2021

Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach.

Sebastian von Peter, Tomi Bergstrøm, Irene Nenoff-Herchenbach, Mark Steven Hopfenbeck, Raffaella Pocobello, Volkmar Aderhold, Mauricio Alvarez-Monjaras, Jaakko Seikkula, Kolja Heumann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sociology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Potential of Poetry in Mental Health Nurse Pre-registration Education.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. De-psychiatrizing our own research work.Frontiers in sociology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastian von PeterMedical School Brandenburg, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Tomi BergstrømDepartment of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Irene Nenoff-HerchenbachOffener Dialog Leibzig e.V, Leibzig, Germany.
Mark Steven HopfenbeckDepartment of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.
Raffaella PocobelloNational Research Council of Italy, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Rome, Italy.
Volkmar AderholdDepartment of Psychiatry, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Mauricio Alvarez-MonjarasDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jaakko SeikkulaDepartment of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.
Kolja HeumannMedical School Brandenburg, Rüdersdorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, the use of psychosocial and psychiatric care systems has increased worldwide. A recent article proposed the concept of psychiatrization as an explanatory framework, describing multiple processes responsible for the spread of psychiatric concepts and forms of treatment. This article aims to explore the potentials of the Open Dialogue (OD) approach for engaging in less psychiatrizing forms of psychosocial support. While OD may not be an all-encompassing solution to de-psychiatrization, this paper refers to previous research showing that OD has the potential to 1) limit the use of neuroleptics, 2), reduce the incidences of mental health problems and 3) decrease the use of psychiatric services. It substantiates these potentials to de-psychiatrize psychosocial support by exploring the OD's internal logic, its use of language, its processes of meaning-making, its notion of professionalism, its promotion of dialogue and how OD is set up structurally. The conclusion touches upon the dangers of co-optation, formalization and universalization of the OD approach and stresses the need for more societal, layperson competencies in dealing with psychosocial crises.

Indexed as

dialogicalmedicalizationneed-adaptedprofessionalismpsychiatrizationpsychocentrismpsychologizationsanism

Identifiers

PMID35004940
PMCPMC8727686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.