Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35004898›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Innovative Approaches to Assess Intermediate Cardiovascular Risk Subjects: A Review From Clinical to Metabolomics Strategies.

Aline M A Martins, Mariana U B Paiva, Diego V N Paiva, Raphaela M de Oliveira, Henrique L Machado, Leonardo J S R Alves, Carolina R C Picossi, Andréa T Faccio, Marina F M Tavares, Coral Barbas and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline M A MartinsCentre of Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), San Pablo CEU University, Madrid, Spain.
Mariana U B PaivaSchool of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Diego V N PaivaSchool of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Raphaela M de OliveiraSchool of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Henrique L MachadoSchool of Medicine, University Center of Brasilia (UniCeub), Brasilia, Brazil.
Leonardo J S R AlvesSchool of Medicine, University Center of Brasilia (UniCeub), Brasilia, Brazil.
Carolina R C PicossiCentre of Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), San Pablo CEU University, Madrid, Spain.
Andréa T FaccioCenter for Multiplatform Metabolomics Studies (CEMM), University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marina F M TavaresCenter for Multiplatform Metabolomics Studies (CEMM), University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Coral BarbasCentre of Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), San Pablo CEU University, Madrid, Spain.
Viviane Z R GiraldezLipid Clinic, Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raul D SantosLipid Clinic, Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme U MonteDepartment of Heart Transplant, Federal District Institute of Cardiology (ICDF), Brasilia, Brazil.
Fernando A AtikSchool of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity Center of Brasília · BRInstituto de Cardiologia do Distrito Federal · BRUniversidad San Pablo CEU · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current risk stratification strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD) have low predictive value in asymptomatic subjects classified as intermediate cardiovascular risk. This is relevant because not all coronary events occur in individuals with traditional multiple risk factors. Most importantly, the first manifestation of the disease may be either sudden cardiac death or acute coronary syndrome, after rupture and thrombosis of an unstable non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaque, which was previously silent. The inaccurate stratification using the current models may ultimately subject the individual to excessive or insufficient preventive therapies. A breakthrough in the comprehension of the molecular mechanisms governing the atherosclerosis pathology has driven many researches toward the necessity for a better risk stratification. In this Review, we discuss how metabolomics screening integrated with traditional risk assessments becomes a powerful approach to improve non-invasive CAD subclinical diagnostics. In addition, this Review highlights the findings of metabolomics studies performed by two relevant analytical platforms in current use-mass spectrometry (MS) hyphenated to separation techniques and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) -and evaluates critically the challenges for further clinical implementation of metabolomics data. We also discuss the modern understanding of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and the limitations of traditional analytical methods. Our aim is to show how discriminant metabolites originated from metabolomics approaches may become promising candidate molecules to aid intermediate risk patient stratification for cardiovascular events and how these tools could successfully meet the demands to translate cardiovascular metabolic biomarkers into clinical settings.

Indexed as

atherosclerosiscardiovascular preventioncoronary artery disease (CAD)metabolomicsrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID35004898
PMCPMC8727773
OpenAlexW4200470787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.