ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
Preclinical Model of Stereotactic Ablative Lung Irradiation Using Arc Delivery in the Mouse: Is Fractionation Worthwhile?
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Genistein Supply and Elemental Composition of Rat Kidneys in an Induced Breast Cancer Model.Nutrients · 2025Article
- The radioprotectant nano-genistein enhances radiotherapy efficacy of lung tumors in mice.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy is characterized by a reduction in target volumes and the use of severely hypofractionated schedules. Preclinical modeling became possible thanks to rodent-dedicated irradiation devices allowing accurate beam collimation and focal lung exposure. Given that a great majority of publications use single dose exposures, the question we asked in this study was as follows: in incremented preclinical models, is it worth using fractionated protocols or should we continue focusing solely on volume limitation? The left lungs of C57BL/6JRj mice were exposed to ionizing radiation using arc therapy and 3 × 3 mm beam collimation. Three-fraction schedules delivered over a period of 1 week were used with 20, 28, 40, and 50 Gy doses per fraction. Lung tissue opacification, global histological damage and the numbers of type II pneumocytes and club cells were assessed 6 months post-exposure, together with the gene expression of several lung cells and inflammation markers. Only the administration of 3 × 40 Gy or 3 × 50 Gy generated focal lung fibrosis after 6 months, with tissue opacification visible by cone beam computed tomography, tissue scarring and consolidation, decreased club cell numbers and a reactive increase in the number of type II pneumocytes. A fractionation schedule using an arc-therapy-delivered three fractions/1 week regimen with 3 × 3 mm beam requires 40 Gy per fraction for lung fibrosis to develop within 6 months, a reasonable time lapse given the mouse lifespan. A comparison with previously published laboratory data suggests that, in this focal lung irradiation configuration, administering a Biological Effective Dose ≥ 1000 Gy should be recommended to obtain lung fibrosis within 6 months. The need for such a high dose per fraction challenges the appropriateness of using preclinical highly focused fractionation schedules in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.