ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2021
Inhibition of SOS Response by Nitric Oxide Donors in
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- SOS-Inducing Drugs Trigger Nucleic Acid Release and Biofilm Formation in Gram-Negative Bacteria.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Drugging evolution of antibiotic resistance at a regulatory network hub.Science advances · 2023Article
- Role of Extracellular DNA in Bacterial Response to SOS-Inducing Drugs.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Previous reports have differed as to whether nitric oxide inhibits or stimulates the SOS response, a bacterial stress response that is often triggered by DNA damage. The SOS response is an important regulator of production of Shiga toxins (Stx) in Shiga-toxigenic Results: Nitric oxide donors inhibited induction of the SOS response by classical inducers such as mitomycin C, ciprofloxacin, and zidovudine, as measured by assays for Conclusions: Nitric oxide donors blocked the initiation step of the SOS response. Downstream effects of this blockade included inhibition of Stx production and of hypermutation. Infection of rabbit loops with STEC resulted in a downregulation, rather than stimulation, of nitric oxide host defenses at 20 h of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.