Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35004271›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Case Report: Molecular Characterization of Aggressive Malignant Retroperitoneal Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Case Study.

Haruna Nonaka, Shuya Kandori, Satoshi Nitta, Masanobu Shiga, Yoshiyuki Nagumo, Tomokazu Kimura, Takashi Kawahara, Hiromitsu Negoro, Akio Hoshi, Takahiro Kojima and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Laparoscopic radical resection of large (223 g) solitary fibrous tumor of the prostate: a case report].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haruna NonakaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Shuya KandoriDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Satoshi NittaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masanobu ShigaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshiyuki NagumoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Tomokazu KimuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takashi KawaharaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiromitsu NegoroDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Akio HoshiDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takahiro KojimaDepartment of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Koji KawaiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.
Bryan J MathisInternational Medical Center, University of Tsukuba Affiliated Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takuro TamuraResearch and Development Centre for Precision Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Taka-Aki SatoResearch and Development Centre for Precision Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Mariko YamatoDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masayuki NoguchiDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) are mesenchymal neoplasms with a favorable prognosis usually originating from the visceral pleura. Rarely, they may occur at various extrapleural sites and show malignant behavior coupled with dedifferentiation. NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene and STAT6 nuclear expression are biomarkers for diagnosis of SFT in addition to CD34, Bcl-2, and CD99. Furthermore, several reports have shown specific NAB2-STAT6 fusion variants and loss of STAT6 protein expression are associated with malignancy. We report a rare case of retroperitoneal SFT which rapidly progressed to death within 35 days after admission. Autopsy found a primary tumor containing both benign and malignant histologies, with multiple metastatic sites similar to the malignant, dedifferentiated tumor. STAT6 was detected in the primary differentiated tumor but not in the primary dedifferentiated tumor or lung/liver metastases. However, the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene (NAB2ex6/STAT6ex16 variant) was detected in the primary tumor and lung/liver metastases. Intriguingly, fusion gene expression at the transcriptional level was downregulated in the dedifferentiated tumors compared to the differentiated tumor. We further performed target DNA sequencing and found gene mutations in TP53, FLT3, and AR in the dedifferentiated tumors, with TP53 mutations especially found among them. We demonstrate that downregulation of NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene at the transcriptional level is associated with malignant SFT for the first time. Moreover, the present study supports the idea that TP53 mutations promote malignancy in SFTs.

Indexed as

malignant solitary fibrous tumorNAB2-STAT6 fusion geneSTAT6 nuclear expressiontarget DNA sequencingTP53 mutation

Identifiers

PMID35004271
PMCPMC8727594
OpenAlexW4200306868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.