Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35004246›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2021

Augmented reality navigation-guided pulmonary nodule localization in a canine model.

Chengqiang Li, Yuyan Zheng, Ye Yuan, Hecheng Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04211051 (Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Pulmonary Surgery Marker System in the Intraoperative Localization of Small Pulmonary Nodules), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04211051 nacompletednot on this map

Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Pulmonary Surgery Marker System in the Intraoperative Localization of Small Pulmonary Nodules

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled10ConditionsLung NeoplasmsArmsLungBrella marker implantation and VATS partial lobe resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. State of the Art in Lung Nodule Localization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chengqiang Li *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuyan Zheng *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ye YuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hecheng LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current intraoperative pulmonary nodule localization techniques require specific medical equipment or skillful operators, which limits their widespread application. Here, we present an innovative nodule localization technique in a canine lung model using augmented reality (AR) navigation.

methodsPeripheral pulmonary lesions were artificially created in canine model. A preoperative chest computed tomography scan was performed for each animal. The acquired computed tomography images were analyzed, and an established intraoperative localization plan was uploaded into HoloLens (a head-mounted AR device). Under general anesthesia, lung localization markers were implanted in each canine, guided by the established procedure plan displayed by HoloLens. All artificial lesions and markers were removed by video-assisted wedge resection or lobectomy in a single operation.

resultsSince June 2019, 12 peripheral pulmonary lesions were artificially created in 4 canine models. All lung localization markers were precisely implanted with a median registration and implantation time of 6 minutes (range, 2-15 minutes). The average distance between pulmonary lesions and markers was 1.9±1.7 mm, based on computed tomography examination after localization. No severe pneumothorax was observed after marker implantation. After an average implantation period of 16.5 days, no marker displacement was observed.

conclusionsThe AR navigation-guided pulmonary nodule localization technique was safe and effective in a canine model. The validity and feasibility of using this technology in patients will be examined further (NCT04211051).

Indexed as

animal studyAugmented reality (AR)intraoperative nodule localizationnavigation

Identifiers

PMID35004246
PMCPMC8674612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.