ArticleMethodsX2021
High throughput method to determine the surface activity of antimicrobial polymeric materials.
Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antitrypanosomal and Antileishmanial Activities ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibacterial efficacy and membrane mechanism of action of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Secondary metabolic profiling of Serratia marcescens NP10 reveals new stephensiolides and glucosamine derivatives with bacterial membrane activity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Creating Robust Antimicrobial Materials with Sticky Tyrocidines.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surface colonization by microorganisms, combined with the rise in antibiotic resistance, is the main cause of production failures in various industries. Self-sterilising materials are deemed the best prevention of surface colonization. However, current screening methods for these sterilising materials are laborious and time-consuming. The disk diffusion antimicrobial assay and the Japanese industrial standard method for antimicrobial activity on solid surfaces, JIS Z 2801, were compared to our modified solid surface antimicrobial assay in terms of detecting the activity of antibiotic-containing cellulose disks against four bacterial pathogens. Our novel assay circumvents the long incubation times by utilising the metabolic active dye, resazurin, to shorten the time in which antibacterial results are obtained to less than 4 h. This assay allows for increased screening to identify novel sterilising materials for combatting surface colonisation.•Disk diffusion assay could only detect the activity of small compounds that leached from the material over 20-24 h.•JIS Z 2801 was also able to detect the surface activity of non-polar compounds, thought to be inactive based on the disk diffusion results.•The resazurin solid surface antimicrobial assay could obtain the same results as the JIS Z 2801, within a shorter time and in a high-throughput 96-well plate setup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.