ArticleMethodsX2021
DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation analysis using a high throughput and low bias direct injection mass spectrometry platform.
Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amyloid-mediated RNA uptake by sperm for embryonic delivery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay of DNA Cytosine Methylation Excretion from Biological Systems.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Gene body DNA hydroxymethylation restricts the magnitude of transcriptional changes during aging.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Qualitative and Quantitative Analytical Techniques of Nucleic Acid Modification Based on Mass Spectrometry for Biomarker Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Characterization of the dual role of Plasmodium falciparum DNA methyltransferase in regulating transcription and translation.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Methamphetamine Dysregulates Macrophage Functions and Autophagy to Mediate HIV Neuropathogenesis.Biomedicines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA modifications are small covalent chemical groups that modify nucleotides to regulate DNA readout. Anomalous abundance and genome-wide localization of these modifications can negatively tune gene expression and propagate into unbalanced epigenetics regulation, which is known to be associated with multiple conditions such as cancer, diabetes and aging. We present a direct injection mass spectrometry (DI-MS) platform that offers fast, accurate and precise quantitation of global levels of DNA cytidine methylation (mC) and hydroxymethylation (hmC) in less than one minute per sample. On the contrary to most methods adopting mass spectrometry for the analysis of nucleotide modifications, in this DI-MS approach we eliminate the use of liquid chromatography, increasing throughput, eliminating issues of carryover and batch effects caused by column contamination across samples. In addition, potential biases in detection efficiency of modified nucleotides with different binding efficiency to stationary phases is eliminated, as no chromatographic separation is adopted. This method can analyze >1000 samples per day, overcoming the throughput of next-generation sequencing.•Direct injection mass spectrometry improves throughput and precision compared to liquid chromatography.•Direct injection can be used to quantify in less than one minute global levels of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation.•The unbiased acquisition can be potentially utilized to analyze other nucleotide modifications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.