ArticleMethodsX2021
Open-source computational simulation of moth-inspired navigation algorithm: A benchmark framework.
Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bumblebee-Inspired Spatial Memory Navigation Framework for Robotic Odor Source Localization.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploration-exploitation model of moth-inspired olfactory navigation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Olfactory navigation is defined as a task of a self-propelled navigator with some sensors capabilities to detect odor (or scalar concentration) convected and diffused in a windy environment. Known for their expertise in locating an odor source, male moths feature a bio-inspirational model of olfactory navigation using chemosensory. Many studies have developed moths-inspired algorithms based on proposed strategies of odor-sourcing. However, comparing among various bio-inspired strategies is challenging, due to the lack of a componential framework that allows statistical comparison of their performances, in a controlled environment. This work aims at closing this gap, using an open source, freely accessible simulation framework. To demonstrate the applicability of our simulated framework as a benchmarking tool, we implemented two different moth-inspired navigation strategies; for each strategy, specific modifications in the navigation module were carried out, resulting in four different navigation models. We tested the performance of moth-like navigators of these models through various wind and odor spread parameters in a virtual turbulent environment. The performance of the navigators was comprehensively analyzed using bio-statistical tests. This benchmark-ready simulation framework could be useful for the biology-oriented, as well as engineering-oriented studies, assisting in deducing the evolutionary efficient strategies and improving self-propelled autonomous systems in complex environments.•The open-source framework `Mothpy' provides a computational platform that simulates the behavior of moth-like navigators, using two main inputs to be modified by the user: (1) flow condition; and (2) navigation strategy.•`Mothpy' can be used as a benchmarking platform to compare the performance of multiple moth-like navigators, under various physical environments, and different searching strategies.•Method name: Mothpy 0.0.1' - an open-source moth-inspired navigator simulator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.