ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2022
A survey of the research practice in general medicine departments of Japanese universities: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leadership and Research Productivity in Japan's Academic Departments of Regional Healthcare: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Perceptions, attitudes, and barriers to research engagement among general medicine undergraduates in a tertiary hospital in Guangdong, China.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- How Do We Establish the Utility and Evidence of General Medicine in Japan?International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Comparing Japanese University Hospitals' and Community Healthcare Facilities' Research Contributions on PubMed.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- A survey of the research practice in general medicine departments of Japanese universities: A cross-sectional study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2022Article
- Research Trends and Impact Factor on PubMed Among General Medicine Physicians in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Staff Numbers Matter.Journal of general and family medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have focused on research practice in Japanese university general medicine (GM) departments.
methodsThis is a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study to clarify the research achievement and associated factors of Japanese university GM department. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the number of English-language research publications and explanatory variables.
resultsForty-seven universities responded. Over a 3 years period, the median number of English-language research publications was 6. Perceived degree of research necessity, staff numbers, collaborative research, conference presentations, and obtaining research grants were significantly associated with a higher number of English-language research publications.
conclusionsWhile GM research output was found to be limited, numerous associated factors can potentially change Japanese GM departments' research environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.