ArticleCureus2021
Post-chemotherapy Changes in Bone Marrow in Acute Leukemia With Emphasis on Detection of Residual Disease by Immunohistochemistry.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Marked Bone Marrow Eosinophilia Post-Azacitidine + Ivosidenib Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction In acute leukemia, the leading cause of treatment failure is disease relapse leading to a low level of complete remission and short overall survival. Post-chemotherapy marrow examination gives vital clues regarding treatment response and marrow regeneration. Aim We aimed to study the histomorphological changes in post-chemotherapy bone marrow in acute leukemias, monitor residual disease by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on trephine biopsy, and correlate survival status. Method This study was a prospective clinical study. A total of 155 post-induction cases (acute myeloid leukemia [AML] - 68 and acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL] - 87), from January 2014 to December 2015, were included with a follow-up of 4-28 months. A detailed histomorphology was studied in all cases. IHC was applied in 88 cases of post-induction marrow, which showed morphologic suspicion of an increase in blasts. Observations Post-induction marrow was hypercellular in 55.9% of AML and normocellular in 56.3% of ALL. Regenerative hematopoiesis was noted in 37.4% of AML and 88.5% of cases of ALL. Marrow serous atrophy and stromal edema were associated with delayed recovery of counts and their recovery duration ranged from one to five months. Twenty-seven bone marrow aspirates were unsatisfactory, and their trephine biopsies were showed remission in 20 cases and stromal changes in nine cases. In addition, trephine biopsy picked up residual leukemic blasts in four cases in which aspirate showed remission status. Post-induction marrow IHC with scattered positivity for blasts showed sustained remission in 96% cases, and in those with clustered positivity, 28.6% showed residual disease, and 7.2% showed relapse at the end of the study period. The median survival duration was 13, 3, and 12 months for cases with sustained remission, residual disease, and relapse, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in median survival of patients in the three groups (sustained remission, residual disease, and relapse) (p=0.000). Conclusion We conclude that histomorphology augmented by IHC on trephine biopsy gives valuable information regarding post-chemotherapy changes and residual disease status. Bone marrow trephine biopsy is an important tool to assess the remission status of patients with acute leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.