Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003999›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Barriers and Facilitators in Rehabilitation in Chronic Diseases and After Surgery: Is It a Matter of Adherence?

Elijah E Sanches, Emily Aupers, Nasser Sakran, James Navalta, Tomasz Kostka, Sjaak Pouwels

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07782749 (Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07782749 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di SassariRan2026 to 2029Enrolled46ConditionsCardiac RehabilitationArmsVirtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Barriers and Enablers for Accessing Rehabilitation Services: Findings From the Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 1-Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Elijah E SanchesSurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, NLD.
Emily AupersIntensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, NLD.
Nasser SakranSurgery, Emek Medical Center, Afula, ISR.
James NavaltaKinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, USA.
Tomasz KostkaGeriatrics and Sports Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, POL.
Sjaak PouwelsIntensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, NLD.
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLEmek Medical Center · ILLeiden University Medical Center · NLMedical University of Lodz · PLUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it has been generally acknowledged that participating in rehabilitation programs is better for chronic diseases or post-surgery, the adherence rates of these programs remain lower than expected. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), adherence has been defined as follows: "the extent to which a person's behavior corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider." In general, rehabilitation is well investigated, and in chronic diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, neuromuscular disease, cancer, and even psychiatric diseases like depression, it has been shown that exercise therapy, in particular, has beneficial effects on morbidity, mortality, and convalescence of these patients. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the barriers and facilitators in rehabilitation practices and possible reasons why adherence rates remain low. Regarding potential future research, barriers and facilitators also need to be taken into account. Despite promising research in the field of preoperative exercise therapy (PET) and preoperative rehabilitation (prehab) and the enormous body of evidence in postoperative rehabilitation or rehabilitation in chronic diseases, it is also needed to take into account the accessibility of these prehab facilities in research and in clinical practice.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationcomplicationspreoperative exercise therapypulmonary rehabilitationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35003999
PMCPMC8723784
OpenAlexW4200138821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.