ReviewCureus2021
Cobb's Tufts: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Recurrent spontaneous hyphema assosiated with focal iris vascular leakage-successful treatment with argon laser photocoagulation].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Oral tranexamic acid for acute management of active bleeding from iris microhemangiomatosis: A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- Spontaneous hyphema from iris microhemangioma in Eisenmenger syndrome.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cobb's tufts, also known as iris vascular tufts (IVT) and iris microhemangiomas (IMH), are coils of tightly clustered, minute blood vessels at the iris pupillary border. This study aimed to analyze previous literature and provide an update on Cobb's tufts. A systematic literature review was carried out by interrogating PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Full-text English language articles of any year were included in this study. A total of 38 articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. A total of 115 reported cases of Cobb's tufts were incorporated into our review. The age of the patients ranged between 36 and 86 years. No sex or racial predisposition was noted. Most patients had no history of trauma, surgery, or blood dyscrasia. The majority of cases are asymptomatic and bilateral unless a spontaneous hyphema occurs, which most commonly presents as blurred vision. The etiology of this condition remains uncertain; however, a higher incidence has been shown in systemic conditions such as myotonic dystrophy and diabetes. Fluorescein angiography can be utilized to investigate tufts. Management includes treatment of raised intraocular pressure, observation for single bleeds, laser therapy for recurrent hyphemas, and lastly, iridectomy, which is considered in cases of recurrence following laser treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.