Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003978›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Varicella-Zoster Virus Reactivation in AIDS Patient After Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

Raed Atiyat, Samir Elias, Chrystina Kiwan, Hamid S Shaaban, Jihad Slim

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Co-VAN study: COVID-19 vaccine associated neurological diseases- an experience from an apex neurosciences centre and review of the literature.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2023
    Review
  6. Apparent lack of association of COVID-19 vaccination with Herpes Zoster.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raed AtiyatInternal Medicine, Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, USA.
Samir EliasMedical Education, Saint George University, True Blue, GRD.
Chrystina KiwanInternal Medicine, Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, USA.
Hamid S ShaabanHematology and Oncology, Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, USA.
Jihad SlimInfectious Diseases, Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, USA.
St. George's University · GDSaint Michael's Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since early 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has affected millions of individuals and changed the face of medicine. As the fight against COVID continues, there is still unclear long term effects; although as time passes, more and more is being updated, in regards to the risks of exposure, length of recovery, outcomes of those infected, effectiveness of vaccines, and both expected and unique side effects of both the virus and vaccines, all in an array of individuals. This paper will review a unique topic of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the abnormal immune response in a young patient. This case is unique due to the fact that there have been an abundance of side effects reported that are associated with the virus that affects every organ system, yet very few have affected the neurological and integumentary (skin) system. This case emphasizes the reactivation of a Herpes/Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV) in a young male shortly after he received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The other interesting aspect about this case is the patient's immunocompromised state, as he was diagnosed with HIV several years before this viral reactivation occurred. The interesting aspect about this was trying to understand whether the VZV was truly reactivated because of an overly stressful immune reaction in response to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine or was it mainly due to the patient's already weak immune system, or even a combination of both? The in-depth review will evaluate whether there should be more done in regards to bringing more awareness about potential side effects and preparing for a VZV reactivation and/or other dermatological complications after being vaccinated. This presentation could also simply be a very unique, isolated case, and that each individual should have no hesitations regarding the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Indexed as

adverse effectaidscovidimmunocompromisedvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35003978
PMCPMC8723776
OpenAlexW4200614353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.