ArticleCureus2021
Limb Occlusion Pressure Versus Standard Pneumatic Tourniquet Pressure in Open Carpal Tunnel Surgery - A Randomized Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06575088 (Effect of Cuff Pressure Level and Protective Padding Material Selection on the Prevention of Skin Complications in Pneumatic Tourniquet Applications in Upper Extremity Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Cuff Pressure Level and Protective Padding Material Selection on the Prevention of Skin Complications in Pneumatic Tourniquet Applications in Upper Extremity Surgery: Clinical Research
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limb Occlusion Pressure Versus Standard Pneumatic Tourniquet Pressure in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Trial
- Beneath the cuff: Often overlooked and under-reported blood flow restriction device features and their potential impact on practice-A review of the current state of the research.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Cannabidiol Perceptions and Use in the Orthopaedic Patient Population.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPneumatic tourniquets are used extensively in orthopedic hand/wrist surgery. Complications, while rare, are associated with elevated pressure and duration of tourniquet use. Limb occlusion pressure (LOP) is the minimum tourniquet pressure at which arterial blood flow is restricted. Therefore, we performed a cross-sectional double-blinded randomized control trial to assess if there is a difference in post-operative pain at the surgical and tourniquet site between LOP and standard tourniquet pressure and if there is a difference in post-operative opioid usage.
methodsA total of 44 patients (Age 60±13, 30 female, 14 male) were randomized into two groups (LOP, 191±14 mmHg | STP, 250 mmHg) of 22 patients controlling for gender (15 female, seven male). The primary outcome was a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at the tourniquet and surgical sites, recorded for the first two weeks post-operative. Daily pain medication usage was recorded and quantified using oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). A group-by-time generalized mixed-model ANOVA was used to detect within-group and between group (LOP vs STP) differences in VAS at the surgical and tourniquet sites as well as medication use. Results: LOP significantly decreased post-operative pain medication usage across the first week (-50%; p<0.05). Both groups had similar VAS pain at the surgery site, but the LOP group had 80% reduced pain at the tourniquet site when averaged across the first post-operative week (p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of LOP compared to STP elicits reduced post-operative pain at the tourniquet site and reduces post-operative pain medication use in the first post-operative week.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.