Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003889›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

The use of

Andrea O Fontana, Mary Gonzalez Melo, Gilles Allenbach, Costa Georgantas, Ruijia Wang, Olivier Braissant, Frederic Barbey, John O Prior, Diana Ballhausen, David Viertl

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Glomerular filtration rate calculation based onAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea O FontanaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mary Gonzalez MeloPaediatric Metabolic Unit, Pediatrics, Woman-Mother-Child Department, University of Lausanne and University Hospital of Lausanne Switzerland.
Gilles AllenbachDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Costa GeorgantasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ruijia WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier BraissantService of Clinical Chemistry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Frederic BarbeyDepartment of Immunology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
John O PriorDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Diana BallhausenPaediatric Metabolic Unit, Pediatrics, Woman-Mother-Child Department, University of Lausanne and University Hospital of Lausanne Switzerland.
David ViertlDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvaluation of glomerular filtration rate is very important in both preclinical and clinical setting, especially in the context of chronic kidney disease. It is typically performed using

methods

resultsGlomerular filtration ranged from 0.025±0.01 ml/min at 6 weeks to 0.049±0.05 ml/min at 6 months in wild type rats. Glomerular filtration was significantly lower in knock-in rats at 6 and 12 months (P<0.01). No significant difference was observed in renal volumes between knock-in and wild type animals, based on imaging-derived volume calculations.

conclusions

Indexed as

gallium-68 EDTAGlomerular filtration ratepositron emission tomographyrenal plasma functionrutland-patlak plot

Identifiers

PMID35003889
PMCPMC8727875
OpenAlexW4206864754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.