ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Blood identification at the single-cell level based on a combination of laser tweezers Raman spectroscopy and machine learning.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for bacterial pathogen identifications.Journal of advanced research · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser tweezers Raman spectroscopy (LTRS) combines optical tweezers technology and Raman spectroscopy to obtain biomolecular compositional information from a single cell without invasion or destruction, so it can be used to "fingerprint" substances to characterize numerous types of biological cell samples. In the current study, LTRS was combined with two machine learning algorithms, principal component analysis (PCA)-linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and random forest, to achieve high-precision multi-species blood classification at the single-cell level. The accuracies of the two classification models were 96.60% and 96.84%, respectively. Meanwhile, compared with PCA-LDA and other classification algorithms, the random forest algorithm is proved to have significant advantages, which can directly explain the importance of spectral features at the molecular level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.