Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003825›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2022

Machine learning empowered COVID-19 patient monitoring using non-contact sensing: An extensive review.

Umer Saeed, Syed Yaseen Shah, Jawad Ahmad, Muhammad Ali Imran, Qammer H Abbasi, Syed Aziz Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Umer SaeedResearch Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK.
Syed Yaseen ShahSchool of Computing, Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Jawad AhmadSchool of Computing, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK.
Muhammad Ali ImranJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Qammer H AbbasiJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Syed Aziz ShahResearch Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has affected more than 400 million people worldwide. With the recent rise of new Delta and Omicron variants, the efficacy of the vaccines has become an important question. The goal of various studies has been to limit the spread of the virus by utilizing wireless sensing technologies to prevent human-to-human interactions, particularly for healthcare workers. In this paper, we discuss the current literature on invasive/contact and non-invasive/non-contact technologies (including Wi-Fi, radar, and software-defined radio) that have been effectively used to detect, diagnose, and monitor human activities and COVID-19 related symptoms, such as irregular respiration. In addition, we focused on cutting-edge machine learning algorithms (such as generative adversarial networks, random forest, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, extremely randomized trees, and k-nearest neighbors) and their essential role in intelligent healthcare systems. Furthermore, this study highlights the limitations related to non-invasive techniques and prospective research directions.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCOVID-19Machine learningNon-contact sensingNon-invasive healthcare

Identifiers

PMID35003825
PMCPMC8724017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.