Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003759›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2021

A systematic review of phage therapy applied to bone and joint infections: an analysis of success rates, treatment modalities and safety.

Joseph Genevière, Shawna McCallin, Angela Huttner, Truong-Thanh Pham, Domizio Suva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Osteomyelitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  7. Complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Potential of Synbiotics and Probiotics as Chemopreventive Agent.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024
    Review
  17. Successful phage-antibiotic therapy ofThe veterinary quarterly · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Phage Therapy Against Antibiotic-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Infections Involving Nonhealing Wounds and Prosthetic Joint Infections Associated With Biofilms: A Mini-Review.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph Genevière1Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shawna McCallin2Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Angela Huttner1Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Truong-Thanh Pham1Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-7080
Domizio Suva1Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone and joint infections are difficult to treat, and increasing antibiotic resistance has only made them more challenging. This has led to renewed interest in phage therapy (PT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine success rate, current treatment modalities and safety of PT in bone and joint infections.A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases as well as the journal

Indexed as

bacteriophagesbone and joint infectionorthopaedicsosteomyelitisperiprosthetic joint infectionphage therapysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35003759
PMCPMC8722473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.