ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2022
Real-world data in elderly men from Yokosuka City 15 years after introducing prostate-specific antigen-based population screening.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Should Contemporary Western Guidelines Based on Studies Conducted in the 2000s Be Adopted for the Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Policy for Asian Men in the 2020s?The world journal of men's health · 2022Review
- Low anti-CFL1 antibody with high anti-ACTB antibody is a poor prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass screening based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduces mortality in prostate cancer. However, the effectiveness of this screening in the elderly has not been demonstrated. In the city of Yokosuka, Japan, PSA screening has been conducted since 2001 and the present study examined the real-world status of PSA-based population screening in the elderly. It retrospectively evaluated 1,117 prostate cancer patients >75 years of age. The patients were divided into two groups: The screened group comprising patients diagnosed by PSA-based population screening or workplace screening and PSA follow-up patients at urology clinics; and the non-screened group comprising patients detected by other methods. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and factors contributing to shorter CSS between the groups were compared. In patients >75 years of age, the screened group had significantly longer OS (171 vs. 154 months; P=0.019) and CSS (median not reached; P=0.020) but screening was not an independent factor associated with prolonged OS or CSS on multivariate analysis. The factors contributing to shorten CSS in the elderly were ≥T3 (odds ratio: 3.301 [1.704-6.369], P<0.001), M1 (odds ratio: 4.856 [2.809-8.393], P<0.001) and Gleason score ≥8 (odds ratio: 4.691 [2.479-8.876], P<0.001). In those with metastasis, PSA screening was not associated with prolonged OS or CSS. Real-world data 15 years after introducing PSA-based population screening was not an independent factor for both OS and CSS in multivariate analyses for patients >75 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.