Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003730›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Pulmonary barotrauma in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dhan Bahadur Shrestha, Yub Raj Sedhai, Pravash Budhathoki, Ayush Adhikari, Nisheem Pokharel, Richa Dhakal, Satyasuna Kafle, Wasey Ali Yadullahi Mir, Roshan Acharya, Markos G Kashiouris and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Dhan Bahadur ShresthaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yub Raj SedhaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Pravash BudhathokiDepartment of Internal Medicine, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, NY, USA.
Ayush AdhikariDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, TU Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nisheem PokharelDepartment of Internal Medicine, KIST Medical College, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Richa DhakalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Satyasuna KafleDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Bhaktapur Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Wasey Ali Yadullahi MirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Roshan AcharyaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, NC, USA.
Markos G KashiourisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Mark S ParkerDepartment of Radiology, Division of Thoracic Imaging, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USMount Sinai Hospital · USBhaktapur Cancer Hospital · NPCape Fear Valley Medical Center · USKathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital · NPKIST Medical College · NPMontefiore Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn ever-increasing number of studies have reported an increased incidence of spontaneous pulmonary barotrauma such as pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema in patients with COVID-19. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the value and significance of the available data.

methodsA thorough systematic search was conducted to identify studies of barotrauma in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Data analysis of case reports was done using a statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 22, and meta-analysis was performed using CMA-3.

resultsWe identified a total of 4488 studies after thorough database searching.118 case reports and series, and 15 observational studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Fifteen studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The observational studies reported barotrauma in 4.2% (2.4-7.3%) among hospitalized patients; 15.6% (11-21.8%) among critically ill patients; and 18.4% (13-25.3%) in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, showing a linear relationship of barotrauma with the severity of the disease. In addition, barotrauma was associated with a longer length of hospital stay, more extended ICU stay, and higher in-hospital mortality. Also, a slightly higher odds of barotrauma was seen in COVID-19 ARDS compared with non-COVID-19 ARDS.

conclusionCOVID-19 pneumonia is associated with a higher incidence of barotrauma. It presents unique challenges for invasive and non-invasive ventilation management. Further studies are required to unravel the underlying pathophysiology and develop safer management strategies.

Indexed as

ARDS, Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeBarotraumaCOVID-19COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019ICU, Intensive Care UnitIMV, Invasive Mechanical VentilationNIPPV, Non-invasive Positive Pressure VentilationPneumomediastinumPneumopericardiumPneumothoraxSARS-Cov-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2Subcutaneous emphysema

Identifiers

PMID35003730
PMCPMC8721930
OpenAlexW4205790580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.