Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003711›Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2021

Interventions to reduce preterm birth and stillbirth, and improve outcomes for babies born preterm in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Elizabeth Wastnedge, Donald Waters, Sarah R Murray, Brian McGowan, Effie Chipeta, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Luis Gadama, Gladys Gadama, Martha Masamba, Monica Malata and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health economic evaluations of programs reducing preterm birth: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Predictive values of cervix length measurement based on transvaginal ultrasonography.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth Wastnedge *Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Donald Waters *Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah R MurrayMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Brian McGowanMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Effie ChipetaCentre for Reproductive Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Alinane Linda Nyondo-MipandoDepartment of Health Systems & Policy, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Luis GadamaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Gladys GadamaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Martha MasambaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Monica MalataCentre for Reproductive Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Frank TauloDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Queen DubeDepartment of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Kondwani KawazaDepartment of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Patricia Munthali KhomaniMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Research Program, Blantyre, Malawi.
Sonia WhyteMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Mia CrampinMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Bridget FreyneMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Research Program, Blantyre, Malawi.
Jane E NormanFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rebecca M ReynoldsMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
DIPLOMATIC Collaboration
University of Malawi · MWMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme · MWMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit · MWMedical Research Council · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing preterm birth and stillbirth and improving outcomes for babies born too soon is essential to reduce under-5 mortality globally. In the context of a rapidly evolving evidence base and problems with extrapolating efficacy data from high- to low-income settings, an assessment of the evidence for maternal and newborn interventions specific to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is required.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was done. We included all studies performed in LMICs since the Every Newborn Action Plan, between 2013 - 2018, which reported on interventions where the outcome assessed was reduction in preterm birth or stillbirth incidence and/or a reduction in preterm infant neonatal mortality. Evidence was categorised according to maternal or neonatal intervention groups and a narrative synthesis conducted.

results179 studies (147 primary evidence studies and 32 systematic reviews) were identified in 82 LMICs. 81 studies reported on maternal interventions and 98 reported on neonatal interventions. Interventions in pregnant mothers which resulted in significant reductions in preterm birth and stillbirth were (i) multiple micronutrient supplementation and (ii) enhanced quality of antenatal care. Routine antenatal ultrasound in LMICs increased identification of fetal antenatal conditions but did not reduce stillbirth or preterm birth due to the absence of services to manage these diagnoses. Interventions in pre-term neonates which improved their survival included (i) feeding support including probiotics and (ii) thermal regulation. Improved provision of neonatal resuscitation did not improve pre-term mortality rates, highlighting the importance of post-resuscitation care. Community mobilisation, for example through community education packages, was found to be an effective way of delivering interventions.

conclusionsEvidence supports the implementation of several low-cost interventions with the potential to deliver reductions in preterm birth and stillbirth and improve outcomes for preterm babies in LMICs. These, however, must be complemented by overall health systems strengthening to be effective. Quality improvement methodology and learning health systems approaches can provide important means of understanding and tackling implementation challenges within local contexts. Further pragmatic efficacy trials of interventions in LMICs are essential, particularly for interventions not previously tested in these contexts.

Indexed as

Premature BirthStillbirthDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePregnancyResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID35003711
PMCPMC8709903
OpenAlexW3111846206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.