Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003646›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Sex role similarity and sexual selection predict male and female song elaboration and dimorphism in fairy-wrens.

Karan J Odom, Kristal E Cain, Michelle L Hall, Naomi E Langmore, Raoul A Mulder, Sonia Kleindorfer, Jordan Karubian, Lyanne Brouwer, Erik D Enbody, John Anthony Jones and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Karan J OdomCornell Lab of Ornithology and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9074-135X
Kristal E CainResearch School of Biology Australian National University Canberra ACT Australia.
Michelle L HallSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-8314
Naomi E LangmoreResearch School of Biology Australian National University Canberra ACT Australia.
Raoul A MulderSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Sonia KleindorferCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide SA Australia.
Jordan KarubianDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana USA.
Lyanne BrouwerResearch School of Biology Australian National University Canberra ACT Australia.
Erik D EnbodyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-628X
John Anthony JonesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2615-1248
Jenélle L DowlingDivision of Biological Sciences University of Montana Missoula Montana USA.
Ana V LeitãoSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-9158
Emma I GreigCornell Lab of Ornithology and Project Feeder Watch Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
Christine EvansCollege of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide SA Australia.
Allison E JohnsonSchool of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA.
Kimberley K-A MeyersSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Marcelo Araya-SalasCornell Lab of Ornithology and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
Michael S WebsterCornell Lab of Ornithology and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7585-4578
Cornell University · USAustralian National University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUTulane University · USBush Heritage Australia · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity of Montana · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, bird song complexity was thought to evolve primarily through sexual selection on males; yet, in many species, both sexes sing and selection pressure on both sexes may be broader. Previous research suggests competition for mates and resources during short, synchronous breeding seasons leads to more elaborate male songs at high, temperate latitudes. Furthermore, we expect male-female song structure and elaboration to be more similar at lower, tropical latitudes, where longer breeding seasons and year-round territoriality yield similar social selection pressures in both sexes. However, studies seldom take both types of selective pressures and sexes into account. We examined song in both sexes in 15 populations of nine-fairy-wren species (Maluridae), a Southern Hemisphere clade with female song. We compared song elaboration (in both sexes) and sexual song dimorphism to latitude and life-history variables tied to sexual and social selection pressures and sex roles. Our results suggest that song elaboration evolved in part due to sexual competition in males: male songs were longer than female songs in populations with low male survival and less male provisioning. Also, female songs evolved independently of male songs: female songs were slower paced than male songs, although only in less synchronously breeding populations. We also found male and female songs were more similar when parental care was more equal and when male survival was high, which provides strong evidence that sex role similarity correlates with male-female song similarity. Contrary to Northern Hemisphere latitudinal patterns, male and female songs were more similar at higher, temperate latitudes. These results suggest that selection on song can be sex specific, with male song elaboration favored in contexts with stronger sexual selection. At the same time, selection pressures associated with sex role similarity appear to favor sex role similarity in song structure.

Indexed as

complexitydimorphismlife historyMalurussex roles

Identifiers

PMID35003646
PMCPMC8717346
OpenAlexW4200529794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.