ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2021
A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconia Dental Implants: 10-Year Follow-Up.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of a two-piece zirconia dental implant system.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Ten-Year Results of a Prospective Case Series on Immediately Provisionalized One-Piece Alumina-Toughened Zirconia (ATZ) Oral Implants for Single-Tooth Restoration and Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Article
- Tensile Retention of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Crowns Cemented to One-Piece Zirconia Implants: A Pilot In Vitro Study of Cementation Protocol, Resin Cement, and Micro-CT Cement Morphology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Long-Term Clinical, Radiographic and Esthetic Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A 10-Year Prospective Multicenter Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Peri-implant soft tissue health: Single-piece implants versus conventional bridges.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Comparison of Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes Between Root-Analog Zirconia and Conventional Zirconia Implants: A Prospective Clinical Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of two cementation protocols for lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia one-piece implants: a micro-CT analysis of cement thickness, porosity, and excess.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of Immediately Restored, Surface Modified Two-Piece Zirconia Implants. A Prospective Case Series.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Five-Year Results of One-Piece Zirconia Oral Implants Supporting Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Non-Linear Biomechanical Evaluation and Comparison in the Assessment of Three Different Piece Dental Implant Systems for the Molar Region: A Finite Element Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Impact of mechanical engineering innovations in biomedical advancements.In vitro models · 2024Review
- Evaluation of one-piece zirconia dental implants: An 8-year follow-up study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Effect of restoration material on marginal bone resorption around modified anatomic zirconia dental implants: A randomised controlled trial.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim is to evaluate the survival and success rates, as well as the marginal bone loss (MBL) and periodontal indexes, of zirconia implants with 10-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND
methods10 patients were selected and 26 one-piece zirconia implants were used for the rehabilitation of single tooth or partially edentulous ridge. After 10 years, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed in order to estimate peri-implant tissue health and marginal bone loss.
resultsThe survival and success rates were 100%. The average marginal bone loss from baseline to 120 months after surgery was 0.92 ± 0.97 mm.
conclusionOne-piece zirconia dental implants are characterised by high biocompatibility, low plaque adhesion, and absence of microgap that can be related to the clinical success of these implants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.