Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35003061›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2021

Immune Response to Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine Among People Living With HIV: A Meta-Analysis.

Yakun Tian, Wei Hua, Yaxin Wu, Tong Zhang, Wen Wang, Hao Wu, Caiping Guo, Xiaojie Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yakun TianCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei HuaCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yaxin WuCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tong ZhangCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wen WangCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hao WuCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Caiping GuoCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaojie HuangCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing YouAn Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is conflicting evidence about whether a double dose of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine induces better immunity than the standard-dose vaccine for people living with HIV (PLWH). This study provides a meta-analysis that summarizes the efficacy of HBV vaccine regimens among HIV-infected patients, clarifying the role of particular factors such as dose and frequency of vaccination in vaccine responsiveness and highlighting the need for evidence-based practice to assess HBV vaccination among PLWH. Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective studies reporting vaccination response rates among PLWH were found through a search of PubMed, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. The key outcome was vaccine response. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled response rate. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate key factors and explore sources of heterogeneity. Possible biases were assessed using quality and publication bias assessment. Results: Eligible studies included controlled trials that examined the effects of 17 interventional studies with 1,821 participants. Among PLWH who received the HBV vaccine, the pooled response rate of HBV vaccination was 71.5% (95% CI 64.0%-77.9%, Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, the double dose of the HBV vaccine and multiple injections were associated with better immune responses than the standard HBV vaccine regimen in PLWH. Higher seroconversion rates were observed in PLWH with high CD4 Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

Indexed as

Hepatitis B VaccinesHepatitis B virusHIVHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHepatitis B Vaccineshepatitis B virushuman immunodeficiency virusimmune responseresponse ratevaccine

Identifiers

PMID35003061
PMCPMC8728056
OpenAlexW4200579987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.