Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002883›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2021

A Comprehensive Approach to Assessment of Testamentary Capacity.

Amanda Kenepp, Ellen Johnson, Grace J Lee, Preeti Sunderaraman, Natalie L Denburg, Christopher M Nguyen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda KeneppDepartment of Psychology, Queens College and The Graduate Center (CUNY), New York, NY, United States.
Ellen JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.
Grace J LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.
Preeti SunderaramanDepartment of Neurology & The Framingham Heart Study - Brain Aging Program, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Natalie L DenburgDepartment of Neurology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, IA, United States.
Christopher M NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing aging population raises important implications for legal and clinical systems, including testamentary capacity (TC) assessment. Yet, there are limited comprehensive and standardized assessment measures for TC readily available for clinical use. A review of current assessment methods and standardized approaches for TC assessment is provided. Although several guidelines regarding TC assessment have been proposed in prior literature, existing standardized approaches do not appear to meet full criteria for TC. A comprehensive approach to assessment of testamentary capacity is proposed.

Indexed as

agingfinancial decision-makingneuropsychological assessmenttestamentary capacityundue influence

Identifiers

PMID35002883
PMCPMC8733255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.