Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2021

Co-occurring Hearing Loss and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: A Dual Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Approach.

Yvonne Tran, Diana Tang, Charles Lo, Catherine McMahon, Paul Mitchell, Bamini Gopinath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Trends in ototoxicity monitoring among cisplatin-treated patients with cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dual trajectory of sleep and frail in elderly people.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yvonne TranMU Hearing, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Diana TangMU Hearing, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Charles LoManagement Disciplinary Group, Wentworth Institute for Higher Education, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Catherine McMahonMU Hearing, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Paul MitchellCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bamini GopinathMU Hearing, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUWestmead Institute for Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss and cognitive impairments are both highly prevalent neurological complications for older adults. While there is growing evidence to suggest that these two conditions are interrelated, little research has been conducted that directly examines the progression and developmental trajectories of these complications contemporaneously. The aim of the study is to identify the distinct trajectory profiles for hearing loss and cognitive function in an older population over a 10-year period. Through dual trajectory modeling, the interrelationship, co-occurring movements, and overlaps between these two complications were examined. We also investigated the influence of hearing aid ownership on cognitive function trajectories. We utilized longitudinal data from 1,445 participants in the Blue Mountains Hearing Study (aged 55+ years) involving repeated measures from a population-based survey with audiometric hearing assessments. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) identified three trajectory profiles for both hearing loss and cognitive function in two older age groups (55-69 years and 70+ years). The outputs from the dual trajectories models showed the conditional probability for "no hearing loss" trajectories to be around 90% more likely to have "high-normal" cognitive function, demonstrating co-occurring overlap. In contrast, for "moderate to severe hearing loss" trajectories, the conditional probability drops to 65% and 79% for the 55-69 age group and 70+ age group respectively. There was also an increasing probability for "cognitive decline" conditional on the severity of hearing loss with 6.7%, 7.5%, and 8.7% for no hearing loss, mild hearing loss, and moderate to severe hearing loss trajectory groups. While we did not find any statistically significant difference in the influence of hearing aid use in the cognitive function trajectories, there was a consistent greater representation of non-hearing aid users in the trajectories with poorer cognitive function. This study found GBTM to identify trajectories that were in agreement with our current understanding of hearing loss and cognitive impairment in older adults. This study also adds to the existing evidence-base as dual trajectories demonstrated co-occurrence in developmental changes in these two common neurological complications for the older population.

Indexed as

agingblue mountains hearing studycognitve functiondual trajectory modelsgroup-based trajectory modelhearing lossolder adults

Identifiers

PMID35002682
PMCPMC8740280
OpenAlexW4200405008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.