Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002642›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2021

Chewing and Cognitive Improvement: The Side Matters.

Maria Paola Tramonti Fantozzi, Vincenzo De Cicco, Davide De Cicco, Paola d'Ascanio, Enrico Cataldo, Luca Bruschini, Ugo Faraguna, Diego Manzoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Occlusal effects on text reading: an eye-tracker study.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Paola Tramonti FantozziDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Vincenzo De CiccoDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Davide De CiccoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Paola d'AscanioDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Enrico CataldoDepartment of Physics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Luca BruschiniDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ugo FaragunaDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Diego ManzoniDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chewing improves cognitive performance, which is impaired in subjects showing an asymmetry in electromyographic (EMG) masseter activity during clenching. In these subjects, the simultaneous presence of an asymmetry in pupil size (anisocoria) at rest indicates an imbalance in Ascending Reticular Activating System (ARAS) influencing arousal and pupil size. The aim of the present study was to verify whether a trigeminal EMG asymmetry may bias the stimulating effect of chewing on cognition. Cognitive performance and pupil size at rest were recorded before and after 1 min of unilateral chewing in 20 subjects with anisocoria, showing an EMG asymmetry during clenching. Unilateral chewing stimulated performance mainly when it occurred on the side of lower EMG activity (and smaller pupil size). Following chewing on the hypotonic side, changes in cognitive performance were negatively and positively correlated with those in anisocoria and pupil size, respectively. We propose that, following chewing on the hypotonic side, the arousing effects of trigeminal stimulation on performance are enhanced by a rebalancing of ARAS structures. At variance, following chewing on the hypertonic side, the arousing effect of trigeminal stimulation could be partially or completely prevented by the simultaneous increase in ARAS imbalance.

Indexed as

anisocoriacognitive performancelocus coeruleuspupil sizetrigeminal asymmetryunilateral chewing

Identifiers

PMID35002642
PMCPMC8734061
OpenAlexW4200510296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.