ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
Measurement of Lead Localization Accuracy Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-Art Imaging and Localization Assessment in Post-Operative Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Review.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Classification of electrically-evoked potentials in the parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus region.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Treated large posterior fossa vestibular schwannoma and meningioma: Hearing outcome and willingness-to-accept brain implant for unilateral deafness.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
- Deep brain-machine interfaces: sensing and modulating the human deep brain.National science review · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-implantation localization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead based on a magnetic resonance (MR) image is widely used. Existing localization methods use artifact center method or template registration method, which may lead to a considerable deviation of > 2 mm, and result in severe side effects or even surgical failure. Accurate measurement of lead position can instantly inform surgeons of the imprecise implantation. This study aimed to identify the influencing factors in DBS lead post-implantation localization approach, analyze their influence, and describe a localization approach that uses the individual template method to reduce the deviation. We verified that reconstructing direction should be parallel or perpendicular to lead direction, instead of the magnetic field. Besides, we used simplified relationship between magnetic field angle and deviation error to correct the localization results. The mean localization error can be reduced after correction and favors the feasibility of direct localization of DBS lead using MR images. We also discussed influence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.