Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002323›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2021

Partial Breast Reconstruction with Lateral Chest Wall Perforator Flap to Facilitate Breast Conservation in Breast Cancer: First 100 Cases with Cancer Outcomes at 8 Years Follow-Up and the Lessons Learned.

Pankaj Gupta Roy, Laura Mustata, Jesse Hu, Ben Phillips, Vaishali Parulekar, Madhu Bhattacharyya, Adrian Harris, Sileida Oliveros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Update and Trends in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy].Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V... · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Pankaj Gupta RoyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Laura MustataDepartment of Breast Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Jesse HuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Ben PhillipsDepartment of Breast Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Vaishali ParulekarDepartment of Breast Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Madhu BhattacharyyaDepartment of Breast Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Adrian HarrisDepartment of Breast Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-8409
Sileida OliverosDepartment of Breast Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Churchill Hospital · GBClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is a prospective cohort study of partial breast reconstruction (PBR) with a lateral chest wall perforator flap (LCWPF) to facilitate breast conservation surgery (BCS) for women undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The study was undertaken to study the clinical and cancer outcomes.

methodsPatients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or breast cancer who consented to undergo BCS with PBR with LCWPF were included in the study. A prospective database has been maintained to collect information on clinico-pathological features, complications, and follow-up. Patients were asked to complete an anonymised PROM questionnaire over the years. The hospital electronic records were interrogated for women who have completed 5 years follow-up to assess for development of recurrence/events.

resultsA total of 105 patients underwent PBR with LCWPFs between 2011 and 2018. Of these, 74% underwent cancer resection and PBR as one operation whilst 26% underwent PBR as a two-stage approach. The median tumor size on pre-op imaging was 30 mm for the one-stage approach and 39.5 mm for the two-stage approach ( DISCUSSION: This is the first published series of recurrence and survival data in patients undergoing PBR. We intend to continue with data collection to assess long-term outcomes beyond 10 years. The authors would recommend consideration of this technique to facilitate BCS and avoid mastectomy. REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast cancer outcomesbreast conservation surgerylateral chest wall perforator flappartial breast reconstructionPBRPROMs

Identifiers

PMID35002323
PMCPMC8722541
OpenAlexW4200225475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.