ArticlePhysics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994)2021
Numerical investigation of droplets in a cross-ventilated space with sitting passengers under asymptomatic virus transmission conditions.
Article in Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asymptomatic virus transmission in public transportation is a complex process that is difficult to analyze computationally and experimentally. We present a high-resolution computational study for investigating droplet dynamics under a speech-like exhalation mode. A large eddy simulation coupled with Lagrangian tracking of drops was used to model a rectangular space with sitting thermal bodies and cross-ventilated with a multislot diffuser. Release of drops from different seat positions was evaluated to analyze the decontamination performance of the ventilation system. The results showed an overall good performance, with an average of 24.1% of droplets removed through the exhaust in the first 40 s. The droplets' distribution revealed that higher concentrations were less prevalent along the center of the domain where the passengers sit. Longitudinal contamination between rows was noted, which is a negative aspect for containing the risk of infection in a given row but has the benefit of diluting the concentration of infectious droplets. Droplets from the window seat raised more vertically and invaded the space of other passengers to a lesser extent. In contrast, droplets released from the middle seat contaminated more the aisle passenger's space, indicating that downward flow from personal ventilation could move down droplets to its breathing region. Droplets released from the aisle were dragged down by the ventilation system immediately. The distance of drops to the mouth of the passengers showed that the majority passed at a relatively safe distance. However, a few of them passed at a close distance of the order of magnitude of 1 cm.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.