Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002179›Full record

ArticleStatistica Sinica2022

Hypothesis Testing for Network Data with Power Enhancement.

Yin Xia, Lexin Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistica Sinica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Approach of High Dimensional Linear Hypothesis Testing Problem.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yin XiaFudan University and University of California at Berkeley.
Lexin LiFudan University and University of California at Berkeley.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Neural and Biochemical Mechanisms of Cognitive AgingR01AG034570 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI William J. Jagust · 2009 to 2026
$12.0M
Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease Progression in the Aging BrainR01AG062542 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI JAGUST, WILLIAM J. · 2019 to 2023
$4.2M
New Statistical Methods for Multicenter Multimodal Longitudinal Neuroimaging AnalysisR01AG061303 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LI, LEXIN · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034570NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061303NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing two population means of network data is of paramount importance in a wide range of scientific applications. Numerous existing network inference solutions focus on global testing of entire networks, without comparing individual network links. The observed data often take the form of vectors or matrices, and the problem is formulated as comparing two covariance or precision matrices under a normal or matrix normal distribution. Moreover, many tests suffer from a limited power under a small sample size. In this article, we tackle the problem of network comparison, both global and simultaneous inferences, when the data come in a different format, i.e., in the form of a collection of symmetric matrices, each of which encodes the network structure of an individual subject. Such data format commonly arises in applications such as brain connectivity analysis and clinical genomics. We no longer require the underlying data to follow a normal distribution, but instead impose some moment conditions that are easily satisfied for numerous types of network data. Furthermore, we propose a power enhancement procedure, and show that it can control the false discovery, while it has the potential to substantially enhance the power of the test. We investigate the efficacy of our testing procedure through both an asymptotic analysis and a simulation study under a finite sample size. We further illustrate our method with examples of brain connectivity analysis.

Indexed as

Auxiliary informationFalse discovery rateMultiple testingNetwork dataPower enhancement

Identifiers

PMID35002179
PMCPMC8734582
OpenAlexW3175765961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.