Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002111›Full record

ArticleJournal of cytology

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical, Cytological and Microbiological Profile in Abdominal vs. Cervical Lymph Nodal Tuberculosis with Special Emphasis on Utility of Auramine-O Staining.

Harveen K Gulati, Michael Mawlong, Arushi Agarwal, Karen R Ranee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harveen K GulatiDepartment of Pathology, Nazareth Hospital, Laitumkhrah, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Michael MawlongDepartment of Microbiology, Nazareth Hospital, Laitumkhrah, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Arushi AgarwalDepartment of Pathology, Nazareth Hospital, Laitumkhrah, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Karen R RaneeDepartment of Microbiology, Nazareth Hospital, Laitumkhrah, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Nazareth Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextExtrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) especially abdominal lymph nodal tuberculosis (LNTB) poses a unique diagnostic challenge. The clinical, cytological, and microbiological profiles, especially with respect to the use and role of Auramine -O (AO) stain, are not as well characterized in abdominal LNTB as cervical LNTB and were evaluated in the present comparative study. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis study was conducted in the Department of Pathology of a tertiary care hospital in Shillong, Meghalaya in 540 clinical suspected cases of tuberculosis who underwent FNAC. The smears were submitted for Leishman's stain for cytological analysis, along with ZN and Auramine O stain for demonstration of the organism, analyzed, and scored and the results were compared with culture wherever available. The results from abdominal and cervical lymph nodal tuberculosis were compared using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software.

resultsOut of 540 cases, most were tuberculosis (266) followed by reactive lymphadenitis (162), malignancy, and acute necrotizing lesion. On comparing, abdominal lymph nodes (

conclusionCytological and microbiologic features of abdominal LNTB differ from cervical LNTB. Moreover, AO stain increases the smear positivity, is almost twice as sensitive as ZN stain and should be used as an adjunct in cytological material wherever available.

Indexed as

Auramine-O stainextrapulmonary tuberculosisfine needle aspiration cytologymycobacterium tuberculosisZiehl-Neelson stain

Identifiers

PMID35002111
PMCPMC8670449
OpenAlexW3217251180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.