Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002094›Full record

ArticleKnowledge-based systems2022

Information retrieval and question answering: A case study on COVID-19 scientific literature.

Arantxa Otegi, Iñaki San Vicente, Xabier Saralegi, Anselmo Peñas, Borja Lozano, Eneko Agirre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knowledge-based systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arantxa OtegiHiTZ Center - Ixa, UPV/EHU, Spain.
Iñaki San VicenteElhuyar fundazioa, Spain.
Xabier SaralegiElhuyar fundazioa, Spain.
Anselmo PeñasNLP & IR Group, UNED, C/Juan del Rosal 16, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Borja LozanoNLP & IR Group, UNED, C/Juan del Rosal 16, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Eneko AgirreHiTZ Center - Ixa, UPV/EHU, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosanitary experts around the world are directing their efforts towards the study of COVID-19. This effort generates a large volume of scientific publications at a speed that makes the effective acquisition of new knowledge difficult. Therefore, Information Systems are needed to assist biosanitary experts in accessing, consulting and analyzing these publications. In this work we develop a study of the variables involved in the development of a Question Answering system that receives a set of questions asked by experts about the disease COVID-19 and its causal virus SARS-CoV-2, and provides a ranked list of expert-level answers to each question. In particular, we address the interrelation of the Information Retrieval and the Answer Extraction steps. We found that a recall based document retrieval that leaves to a neural answer extraction module the scanning of the whole documents to find the best answer is a better strategy than relying in a precise passage retrieval before extracting the answer span.

Indexed as

00-0199-00COVID-19Question answering

Identifiers

PMID35002094
PMCPMC8719365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.