Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35002086›Full record

ArticleNeural computing & applications2022

Enhanced lung image segmentation using deep learning.

Shilpa Gite, Abhinav Mishra, Ketan Kotecha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computing & applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Deep Learning Approach for Biomedical Image Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Self-Configuring Deep Learning Network for Segmentation of Temporal Bone Anatomy in Cone-Beam CT Imaging.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shilpa GiteComputer Science Engineering Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, 412115 India.ORCID 0000-0003-3882-7030
Abhinav MishraComputer Science Engineering Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, 412115 India.
Ketan KotechaComputer Science Engineering Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, 412115 India.
Symbiosis International University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advances in technology, assistive medical systems are emerging with rapid growth and helping healthcare professionals. The proactive diagnosis of diseases with artificial intelligence (AI) and its aligned technologies has been an exciting research area in the last decade. Doctors usually detect tuberculosis (TB) by checking the lungs' X-rays. Classification using deep learning algorithms is successfully able to achieve accuracy almost similar to a doctor in detecting TB. It is found that the probability of detecting TB increases if classification algorithms are implemented on segmented lungs instead of the whole X-ray. The paper's novelty lies in detailed analysis and discussion of U-Net +  + results and implementation of U-Net +  + in lung segmentation using X-ray. A thorough comparison of U-Net +  + with three other benchmark segmentation architectures and segmentation in diagnosing TB or other pulmonary lung diseases is also made in this paper. To the best of our knowledge, no prior research tried to implement U-Net +  + for lung segmentation. Most of the papers did not even use segmentation before classification, which causes data leakage. Very few used segmentations before classification, but they only used U-Net, which U-Net +  + can easily replace because accuracy and mean_iou of U-Net +  + are greater than U-Net accuracy and mean_iou , discussed in results, which can minimize data leakage. The authors achieved more than 98% lung segmentation accuracy and mean_iou 0.95 using U-Net +  + , and the efficacy of such comparative analysis is validated.

Indexed as

Data preprocessingDeep learningLung segmentationSegmentation modelsTB dataset

Identifiers

PMID35002086
PMCPMC8720554
OpenAlexW4205283523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.