Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001936›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2021

Volumetric Changes of a Customized Allogeneic Bone Block Measured by Two Image Matching Tools: Introduction of a Novel Assessment Technique for Graft Resorption.

Oliver Blume, Phil Donkiewicz, Daniel Palkovics, Werner Götz, Péter Windisch

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver BlumePrivate Practice 'Dres. Back & Blume', Tal 13, 80331 Munich, Germany.
Phil DonkiewiczDepartment of Oral Surgery and Dental Emergency Care, Faculty of Health, School of Dentistry, Witten / Herdecke University, North RhineWestphalia, Germany.
Daniel PalkovicsDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi u. 47, 1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Werner GötzDepartment of Orthodontics, Laboratory for Basic Research in Oral Biology, University of Bonn, Germany.
Péter WindischDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi u. 47, 1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Bonn · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this case report was to present a method for the assessment of volumetric changes of bone blocks during healing and demonstrate its practicability by analysing the resorption of a pre-shaped allogeneic bone block used for the reconstruction of a complex maxillary defect. MATERIALS AND

methodsCBCT-scans of a 19-year-old male treated with an allogeneic bone block were recorded pre-OP, post-OP, and following six months of healing. Graft shrinkage was assessed via two image matching tools, namely coDiagnostiX® and Slicer. A biopsy specimen was harvested along the implant canal at the time of implantation.

resultsThe osseous defect was successfully restored and advanced graft remodelling was found upon re-entry as confirmed by the histomorphometric and histologic analysis. The initial volumes of the graft determined via coDiagnostiX® and Slicer were 0.373 mL and 0.370 mL., respectively, while graft resorption after six months of healing was 0.011 mL (3.00%) and 0.016 mL (4.33%).

conclusionsThe avoidance of bone harvesting and reduction of invasiveness display an important issue in dentoalveolar restorations. However, before grafting materials can be considered a safe alternative, understanding their clinical performance, especially resorption stability, is pivotal. The present case report demonstrates a limited resorption of the allogeneic bone block and further emphasizes the practicability of determining bone resorption by the here introduced method. As our investigation comprises solely one subject, the results should be considered with care and substantiated by further studies.

Indexed as

Allogeneic Bone GraftAllograftAllograftsBiomaterialsBone BlockBone GraftingBone SubstitutesFreeze-dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)Graft ResorptionMeSH terms: Bone Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID35001936
PMCPMC8734454
OpenAlexW4200124720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.