Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001932›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2021

Application of Semipermanent Cements and Conventional Cement with Modified Cementing Technique in Dental Implantology.

Valentina Veselinović, Saša Marin, Zoran Tatić, Nataša Trtić, Olivera Dolić, Tijana Adamović, Radmila Arbutina, Miodrag Šćepanović, Aleksandar Todorović

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SEM evaluation of dental cement surface morphology and microbial adhesion - a comparative study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina VeselinovićDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Saša MarinDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Zoran TatićClinic of Dental Medicine, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nataša TrtićDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Olivera DolićDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Tijana AdamovićDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Radmila ArbutinaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Miodrag ŠćepanovićDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandar TodorovićDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Banja Luka · BAUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of artificial ageing on the retention force of original semipermanent cements, as well as the possibility of using conventional cements for semipermanent cementation with adequate modification of the cementing protocol. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty CoCrMo alloy crowns were divided in four groups (each group n=10) and fixed with two semipermanent cements (resin-based and glass ionomer-based cements) and one conventional (zinc phosphate), using conventional and modified cementation techniques on titanium abutments. The samples were stored in humid conditions for 24 hours at 37°C and subjected to thermocycling (500 cycles) and mechanical cyclic loading (7 days, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months function simulation). The cast crowns were removed and the retention force was recorded.

resultsThe highest initial retention force measured was for zinc-phosphate cement - conventional cementing (198,00±61,90 N), followed in descending order by zinc-phosphate cement - modified cementing technique (152,00±45,42 N), long term temporary cement - GC Fuji Temp LT (57,70±20,40 N), and semipermanent cement - Telio CS Cem Implant (56,10±18,68 N). After 12 months, the highest retention force measured was for zinc-phosphate cement - conventional cementing (88, 90±14, 45 N), followed by zinc-phosphate cement - modified cementing (48, 15±14,41N), semipermanent cement GC Fuji Temp LT (16,55±3,88 N) and Telio CS Cem Implant (15,55±5,52 N).

conclusionsZinc-phosphate cement - modified cementing technique and original semipermanent cements can be recommended for conditional permanent cementing of implant supported crowns. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of semipermanenet cements and zinc-phosphate cement - modified cementing technique provides a predictable retrievability of implant-supported crowns.

Indexed as

Artificial AgeingCementationCementing in ImplantoprostheticsConventional CementsCrown RetrievabilityDental ImplantationMechanical TestsMeSH terms: Dental CementsRetention ForceSemipermanent Cements

Identifiers

PMID35001932
PMCPMC8734451
OpenAlexW4200602927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.