Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001798›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2022

Composting and its application in bioremediation of organic contaminants.

Chitsan Lin, Nicholas Kiprotich Cheruiyot, Xuan-Thanh Bui, Huu Hao Ngo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Organic Amendments andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Morphological diversity of actinobacteria isolated from oil palm compost (Elaeis guineensis).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chitsan LinMaritime Science and Technology, College of Maritime, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Nicholas Kiprotich CheruiyotDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Xuan-Thanh BuiKey Laboratory of Advanced Waste Treatment Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh (VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Huu Hao NgoCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review investigates the findings of the most up-to-date literature on bioremediation via composting technology. Studies on bioremediation via composting began during the 1990s and have exponentially increased over the years. A total of 655 articles have been published since then, with 40% published in the last six years. The robustness, low cost, and easy operation of composting technology make it an attractive bioremediation strategy for organic contaminants prevalent in soils and sediment. Successful pilot-and large-scale bioremediation of organic contaminants, e.g., total petroleum hydrocarbons, plasticizers, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) by composting, has been documented in the literature. For example, composting could remediate >90% diesel with concentrations as high as 26,315 mg kg

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalCompostingGeologic SedimentsHydrocarbonsPeriodicals as TopicPesticidesPetroleumSoil PollutantsHydrocarbonsPesticidesPetroleumSoil PollutantsAerobic biodegradationbioaugmentationbio-stimulationgreen technologymicrobial communityrecalcitrant organic contaminants

Identifiers

PMID35001798
PMCPMC8805880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.