Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001665›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2022

Physiology and pathophysiology of human airway mucus.

David B Hill, Brian Button, Michael Rubinstein, Richard C Boucher

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 200 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
200citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
42.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

200 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 310 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David B HillMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9270-777X
Brian ButtonMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-8623-0576
Michael RubinsteinMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-0951
Richard C BoucherMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5745-3989
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Vector CoreP30DK065988 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Scott H Randell · 2004 to 2026
$26.5M
The Biophysics of Mucus Hydration and Adhesion/CohesionP01HL108808 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOUCHER, RICHARD CHARLES · 2012 to 2021
$23.9M
Synthesis of Effective and Safe Mucolytics for Pulmonary DiseaseUH3HL123645 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOUCHER, RICHARD CHARLES · 2016 to 2018
$4.6M
Multiscale Biochemical/Biophysical Integration of Pulmonary Mucus TransportR01HL136961 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOUCHER, RICHARD CHARLES · 2017 to 2020
$3.2M
The role of mucus and pulmonary surface interactions in lung defenseR01HL125280 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUTTON, BRIAN M · 2015 to 2023
$3.1M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) P30 DK 065988NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125280NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136961NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL123645NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK065988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mucus clearance system is the dominant mechanical host defense system of the human lung. Mucus is cleared from the lung by cilia and airflow, including both two-phase gas-liquid pumping and cough-dependent mechanisms, and mucus transport rates are heavily dependent on mucus concentration. Importantly, mucus transport rates are accurately predicted by the gel-on-brush model of the mucociliary apparatus from the relative osmotic moduli of the mucus and periciliary-glycocalyceal (PCL-G) layers. The fluid available to hydrate mucus is generated by transepithelial fluid transport. Feedback interactions between mucus concentrations and cilia beating, via purinergic signaling, coordinate Na

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansLungMucociliary ClearanceMucusairway ion transportgel-on-brush modelmucinsmuco-obstructive diseasesmucus

Identifiers

PMID35001665
PMCPMC9665957
OpenAlexW4206183808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.