Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001333›Full record

ReviewAging clinical and experimental research2022

Improving vaccination rates in older adults and at-risk groups: focus on pertussis.

Jung-Hyun Choi, Jaime Correia de Sousa, Monica Fletcher, Giovanni Gabutti, Lauriane Harrington, Michael Holden, Hyungwoo Kim, Jean-Pierre Michel, Piyali Mukherjee, Terry Nolan and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vaccinations in patients with interstitial lung diseases: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The 2024 resurgence ofFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Jung-Hyun ChoiCatholic University of Eunpyeuong St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-463X
Jaime Correia de SousaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-7908
Monica FletcherUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9700-3552
Giovanni GabuttiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7259-4923
Lauriane HarringtonGSK, Wavre, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-8606
Michael HoldenMNH Associates Ltd, Fleet, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-6159
Hyungwoo KimGSK, Wavre, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-0192
Jean-Pierre MichelDepartment of Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. Jean-Pierre.Michel@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-4394
Piyali MukherjeeGSK, Wavre, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9895-3795
Terry NolanPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6018-3863
Tobias WelteDepartment of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Hannover University School of Medicine, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-7356
Stefania MaggiCNR Aging Branch, Institute of Neuroscience, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-8663
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENeuroscience Institute · ITThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the implementation of effective paediatric vaccination programmes, pertussis remains a global health problem. Disease epidemiology has changed over time, shifting towards the adolescent and adult populations. In adults, the true burden of pertussis is greatly underestimated and pertussis vaccine coverage rates are suboptimal, including individuals with chronic conditions. Here, we report the outcomes of a virtual international scientific workshop to assess the evidence on the burden of pertussis in older adults and identify potential solutions to improve uptake of pertussis vaccines. In adults, pertussis is underdiagnosed in part due to atypical or milder clinical presentation and the lack of testing and case confirmation. However, contemporary epidemiological data denoted an increase in the burden of pertussis among adolescents and adults. This might be related to a variety of reasons including the waning of immunity over time, the lack of booster vaccination, and the improved diagnostic methods that led to increased recognition of the disease in adults. Pertussis sequelae can be severe in older adults, particularly those with existing chronic medical conditions, and the vulnerability of these groups is further enhanced by low pertussis vaccine coverage. Possible measures to increase vaccine uptake include strengthening and harmonisation of immunisation guidelines, healthcare professionals taking a more active role in recommending pertussis vaccination, involvement of vaccination centres and pharmacies in the vaccination process, and improving knowledge of pertussis burden and vaccine efficacy among the general population.

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesWhooping CoughAdolescentAgedHumansImmunization, SecondaryVaccinationVaccine EfficacyDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesAdultsElderlyPertussisRisk groupTdapVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35001333
PMCPMC8743159
OpenAlexW4205884029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.