Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001268›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Treatment technologies for bakers' yeast production wastewater.

Chinenye Adaobi Igwegbe, Ifeoma Amaoge Obiora-Okafo, Kingsley O Iwuozor, Soumya Ghosh, Setyo Budi Kurniawan, Selvasembian Rangabhashiyam, Rahul Kanaoujiya, Joshua O Ighalo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chinenye Adaobi IgwegbeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P. M. B, Awka, 5025, Nigeria. ca.igwegbe@unizik.edu.ng.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-7047
Ifeoma Amaoge Obiora-OkafoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P. M. B, Awka, 5025, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0768-7397
Kingsley O IwuozorDepartment of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P. M. B, Awka, 5025, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-2147
Soumya GhoshDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4945-3516
Setyo Budi Kurniawan, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM, Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0791-1638
Selvasembian RangabhashiyamDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, India. rambhashiyam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-6753
Rahul KanaoujiyaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, 211002, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1413-9658
Joshua O IghaloDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P. M. B, Awka, 5025, Nigeria. oshea.ighalo@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8709-100X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers in recent years have utilized a broad spectrum of treatment technologies in treating bakers' yeast production wastewater. This paper aims to review the treatment technologies for the wastewater, compare the process technologies, discuss recent innovations, and propose future perspectives in the research area. The review observed that nanofiltration was the most effective membrane process for the treatment of the effluent (at >95% pollutant rejection). Other separation processes like adsorption and distillation had technical challenges of desorption, a poor fit for high pollutant load and cost limitations. Chemical treatment processes have varying levels of success but they are expensive and produce toxic sludge. Sludge production would be a hurdle when product recovery and reuse are targeted. It is difficult to make an outright choice of the best process for treating the effluent because each has its merits and demerits and an appropriate choice can be made when all factors are duly considered. The process intensification of the industrial-scale production of the bakers' yeast process will be a very direct approach, where the process optimisation, zero effluent discharge, and enhanced recovery of value-added product from the waste streams are important approaches that need to be taken into account.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeWastewaterDistillationSewageTechnologyWaste Disposal, FluidSewageWastewaterAdvanced oxidation processesBaker’s yeast industryEcotoxicityEnvironmental pollutionMembrane separationWater treatment

Identifiers

PMID35001268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.