ReviewJournal of chemical ecology2022
Chemical Ecology and Olfaction in Short-Horned Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae).
Review in Journal of chemical ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in plump bush crickets vary according to species, sex and mating status.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Behavioral and physiological insights into cross-stage interactions in the desert locust.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Physicochemical and techno-functional characterization of soluble proteins extracted by ultrasound from the cricketHeliyon · 2024Article
- Dibutyl phthalate released by solitary female locusts mediates sexual communication at low density.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- From bristle to brain: embryonic development of topographic projections from basiconic sensilla in the antennal nervous system of the locust Schistocerca gregaria.Development genes and evolution · 2024Article
- Olfactory Mating Signals in the Migratory Locust Locusta migratoria.Journal of chemical ecology · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Comparative morphology and plant volatile responses of antennal sensilla inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- The specific expression patterns of sensory neuron membrane proteins are retained throughout the development of the desert locustCurrent research in insect science · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemoreception plays a crucial role in the reproduction and survival of insects, which often rely on their sense of smell and taste to find partners, suitable habitats, and food sources, and to avoid predators and noxious substances. There is a substantial body of work investigating the chemoreception and chemical ecology of Diptera (flies) and Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies); but less is known about the Orthoptera (grasshoppers, locusts, crickets, and wēta). Within the Orthoptera, the family Acrididae contains about 6700 species of short-horned grasshoppers. Grasshoppers are fascinating organisms to study due to their significant taxonomic and ecological divergence, however, most chemoreception and chemical ecology studies have focused on locusts because they are agricultural pests (e.g., Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria). Here we review studies of chemosensory systems and chemical ecology of all short-horned grasshoppers. Applications of genome editing tools and entomopathogenic microorganism to control locusts in association with their chemical ecology are also discussed. Finally, we identify gaps in the current knowledge and suggest topics of interest for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.