Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001182›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2022

Lateral chest wall perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction.

Ahmed Orabi, Mina M G Youssef, Tamer M Manie, Mohamed Shaalan, Tarek Hashem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap for Axillary Breast Reconstruction in a Previously Irradiated and Dissected Field.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ahmed OrabiSurgical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.orabi@nci.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8273-4945
Mina M G YoussefNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Tamer M ManieBreast Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed ShaalanBreast Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Tarek HashemBreast Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast conserving surgery (BCS) has been a standard procedure for the treatment of breast cancer instead of mastectomy whenever possible. Lateral chest wall perforator flaps are one of the volume replacement techniques that participate in increasing the rate of BCS especially in small- to moderate-sized breasts with good cosmetic outcome. In this study, we tried to evaluate the outcome of those flaps as an oncoplastic procedure instead of the conventional flaps.

methodsThis study included 26 patients who underwent partial mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using lateral chest wall perforator flaps in the period from October 2019 to November 2020. The operative time, techniques, and complications were recorded. The cosmetic outcome was assessed 3 months post-radiation therapy through a questionnaire and photographic assessment.

resultsLateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP), lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) and combined flaps were performed in 24, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 129.6 ± 13.2 min. The flap length ranged from 10 to 20 cm and its width from 5 to 9 cm. Overall patients' satisfaction was observed to be 88.5% as either excellent or good and the photographic assessment was 96.2% as either excellent or good.

conclusionsLateral chest wall perforator flaps are reliable and safe option for partial breast reconstruction with an acceptable aesthetic outcome. In the era of oncoplastic breast surgery, they deserve to gain attention especially with the advantages of some modifications added to the classic technique.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyPerforator FlapThoracic WallFemaleHumansMastectomyLateral chest wall perforator flapsLICAPLTAPOncoplastic breast surgeryVolume replacement

Identifiers

PMID35001182
PMCPMC8743083
OpenAlexW4205107126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.