Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001176›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2022

Home Visiting Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Activity Analysis for Family Connects.

Anna Rybińska, Debra L Best, W Benjamin Goodman, Winona Weindling, Kenneth A Dodge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna RybińskaCenter for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Duke, Box 90539, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. a.rybinska@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-4256
Debra L BestDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, UMC, Box 3675, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
W Benjamin GoodmanCenter for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Duke, Box 90539, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Winona WeindlingCenter for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Duke, Box 90539, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Kenneth A DodgeSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Box 90245, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Funding

Community Prevention of Child MaltreatmentR01HD069981 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DODGE, KENNETH A · 2012 to 2022
$6.3M
Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI James Moody · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly reports highlighted challenges in delivering home visiting programs virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic but the extent of the changes in program implementation and their implications remains unknown. We examine program activity and families' perceptions of virtual home visiting during the first nine months of the pandemic using implementation data for Family Connects (FC), an evidence-based and MIECHV-eligible, postpartum nurse home visiting program. DESCRIPTION: Aggregate program implementation data for five FC sites for January-November of 2019 and 2020 are compared. The COVID-19 Modification Survey is used to analyze families' reactions to virtual program delivery. ASSESSMENT: Post-pandemic onset, FC's program completion rates amounted to 86% of the pre-pandemic activity level. Activity in key components of the intervention-home-visitor education and referrals to community agencies-was maintained at 98% and 87% of the pre-pandemic level respectively. However, education and referrals rates declined among families of color and low-income families. Finally, families reported a positive response to the program, with declines in feelings of isolation and increases in positive attitudes toward in-person medical care-seeking due to FC visits.

conclusionsDuring the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic, families' interest in home visiting remained strong, performance metrics were maintained at high levels, and families responded positively to the virtual delivery of home visiting. Home visiting programs should continue implementation with virtual modifications during the remainder of the pandemic but attention is needed to address growing disparities in access to home visiting benefits among marginalized communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFemaleHouse CallsHumansPostnatal CarePregnancySARS-CoV-2COVID-19 pandemicFamily ConnectsMIECHVVirtual home visiting

Identifiers

PMID35001176
PMCPMC8743084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.