ReviewWorld journal of surgery2022
Despite Major Therapeutic Advances, Vena Caval Trauma Remains Associated with Significant Morbidity and Mortality.
Review in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of penetrating injuries to the retrohepatic inferior vena cava: a systematic review.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2025Article
- Gunshot wound causing penetrating injury to the inferior vena cava treated with open cell self-expanding stents.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024Article
- The effect of an endovascular Heaney maneuver to achieve total hepatic isolation on survival, hemodynamic stability, retrohepatic bleeding, and collateral flow in a porcine model.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Hidden Inferior Vena Cava Injury: A Case of Missed Diagnosis after Preoperative CT and Laparotomy.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPenetrating inferior vena caval injuries remain a challenging operative entity. This study reviews our local experience with the injury over a nine-year period and attempts to contextualize it within the published literature that emanates from South Africa on the topic.
methodsA single-centre retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of all patients who underwent a laparotomy for a penetrating IVC injury. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics, clinical and biochemical parameters, intraoperative data, ICU admission and outcomes.
resultsDuring the nine-year period, thirty-five patients sustained penetrating injuries to the IVC. Mechanism of injury included 25 low velocity gunshots (71%) and 10 stab wounds (29%). The anatomical location included two (6%) supra-renal, six (17%) juxta-renal and 27 (77%) infra-renal injuries. Venorrhaphy was performed in 22 cases (63%) and ligation in 13 (37%). Average ICU stay was 5.4 days. Thirteen patients died (37%), of which six (46%) died within 24 h of arrival.
conclusionDespite dramatic improvements in surgical trauma care over the last four decades, penetrating injury to the IVC carries a high mortality rate ranging from 31 to 37%. It is unlikely that further improvements can be achieved by refining operative techniques and approaches to resuscitation. Future endeavours must focus on applying the burgeoning understanding of endovascular surgery to these injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.