Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35001085›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Forest tree growth is linked to mycorrhizal fungal composition and function across Europe.

Mark A Anthony, Thomas W Crowther, Sietse van der Linde, Laura M Suz, Martin I Bidartondo, Filipa Cox, Marcus Schaub, Pasi Rautio, Marco Ferretti, Lars Vesterdal and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
40.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Mark A AnthonyDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. mark.anthony@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-6255
Thomas W CrowtherDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Sietse van der LindeNetherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, National Reference Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1255-8963
Laura M SuzRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK.
Martin I BidartondoRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK.
Filipa CoxDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Marcus SchaubSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-8892
Pasi RautioNatural Resources Institute Finland, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Marco FerrettiSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Lars VesterdalDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-3735
Bruno De VosEnvironment & Climate Unit, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium.
Mike DettwilerDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Nadine EickenscheidtState Agency for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection of North Rhine-Westphalia, 45657, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Andreas SchmitzState Agency for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection of North Rhine-Westphalia, 45657, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Henning MeesenburgNorthwest German Forest Research Institute, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3035-4737
Henning AndreaeSachsenforst State Forest, 01796, Pirna OT Graupa, Germany.
Frank JacobSachsenforst State Forest, 01796, Pirna OT Graupa, Germany.
Hans-Peter DietrichBavarian State Institute of Forestry, Freising, D-85354, Germany.
Peter WaldnerSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Arthur GesslerDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-9589
Beat FreySwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-3574
Oliver SchrammSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Pim van den BulkThe Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research at Petten, 1755LE, Petten, The Netherlands.
Arjan HensenThe Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research at Petten, 1755LE, Petten, The Netherlands.
Colin AverillDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHETH Zurich · CHBavarian Forest National Park · DENetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DEEberswalde University for Sustainable Development · DEMinistry for Environment, Agriculture, Conservation and Consumer Protection · DENatural Resources Institute Finland · FINetherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority · NLNordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt · DEResearch Institute for Nature and Forest · BEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S017240/1NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre (NEBC) NE/ K006339/1Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) PZ00P3_179900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most trees form symbioses with ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) which influence access to growth-limiting soil resources. Mesocosm experiments repeatedly show that EMF species differentially affect plant development, yet whether these effects ripple up to influence the growth of entire forests remains unknown. Here we tested the effects of EMF composition and functional genes relative to variation in well-known drivers of tree growth by combining paired molecular EMF surveys with high-resolution forest inventory data across 15 European countries. We show that EMF composition was linked to a three-fold difference in tree growth rate even when controlling for the primary abiotic drivers of tree growth. Fast tree growth was associated with EMF communities harboring high inorganic but low organic nitrogen acquisition gene proportions and EMF which form contact versus medium-distance fringe exploration types. These findings suggest that EMF composition is a strong bio-indicator of underlying drivers of tree growth and/or that variation of forest EMF communities causes differences in tree growth. While it may be too early to assign causality or directionality, our study is one of the first to link fine-scale variation within a key component of the forest microbiome to ecosystem functioning at a continental scale.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeEcosystemForestsPlant RootsTrees

Identifiers

PMID35001085
PMCPMC9038731
OpenAlexW4205088000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.